Definition
Disaster management can be defined as the effective organization, direction and utilization of available counter-disaster resources involving several activities of prevention, preparedness, response, recovery, mitigation and risk reduction and rehabilitation. These activities are displayed as continuous cycle as displayed in the figure 6 below.
1. Prevention is measures taken to avert a disaster from occurring, if possible (to impede a hazard so that it does not have any harmful effects).
2. Preparedness is measures taken in anticipation of a disaster to ensure that appropriate and effective actions are taken in the aftermath.
3. Response is actions taken immediately following the impact of a disaster when exceptional measures are required to meet the basic needs of the survivors.
4. Recovery is the process undertaken by a disaster-affected community to fully restore itself to pre-disaster level of functioning.
5. Mitigation and risk reduction are measures taken prior to the impact of a disaster to minimize its effects (sometimes referred to as structural and non-structural measures).
6. Rehabilitation is actions taken in the aftermath of a disaster to: assist victims to repair their dwellings; re-establish essential services; and revive key economic and social activities.
In implementing the DRM approach, accurate and reliable hazard, vulnerability and disaster risk information is vital and relevant to all phases of the disaster management cycle which attaches great importance to hazard mapping and vulnerability assessment as a fundamental tool for good decision-making and efficient sharing of disaster risk information.
Hazard and Vulnerability Map for Mitigation
Hazard map is an effective tool in disaster management in term of providing the residents with the information on the range of damage and disaster prevention activities. There are two types of hazard maps:
1. Residents-educating type: This type of map has the main objective to inform the residents living within the damage forecast area of the risk of danger. The information on spots of danger or places of safety and the basic knowledge on disaster prevention are given to residents. Therefore, it is important that such information is represented in an understandable and very simple language.
2. Administrative information type: This type of map is used as the basic materials that the administrative agencies utilize to conduct disaster preparedness and mitigation service.
Data needed
List of data needed in risk assessment process much depends on type of hazard that we want to assess. In term of multi hazards, the type of data needed and their availabilities are listed in the table 6 below.
Of all the data mention above, some of the data are not available. Thus, to fill the data needed for tsunami vulnerability map, we need to derivate some of the data as follows:
1. Landuse map is derived from topographic map
2. Road map is derived from topographic map
3. Irrigation map is derived from topographic map
4. Fresh water and electricity network can not be derived from the topographic map.
5. Tsunami historical data is derived from previous researches.
Tsunami historical data is needed to conduct the tsunami simulation. This historical data is derived from previous research conduct by Muhari et all as displayed in the figure 7 below. From these historical data, we define tsunami scenario of Pacitan’s coastlines is 14 meter.
The working procedure
In general term, this exercise is conducted through following flowchart displayed in figure 8 below. The following methodological steps are done in this study as follows based on the methodology done by Papathoma and Dominey-Howey (2003):
1. Identification of inundation area and inundation depth area
For this study, we do not consider tsunami source and seabed topography. To identify inundation zone, we use historical data and combining it with elevation data. Elevation data was derived from SRTM data (90x90 meter) downloaded from USGS (2009). The highest tsunami run-up for south coast of
- IDZ 1 (High IDZ) : ground elevation 0 – 5 meter
- IDZ 2 (Medium IDZ) : ground elevation 5 – 10 meter
- IDZ 3 (Low IDZ) : ground elevation 10 – 14 meter
- IDZ 4 (Very low IDZ) : ground elevation > 14 meter
These inundation depth zones are used as a background for the maps in displaying the spatial vulnerability of element at risk, in this case settlement. The settlement located in high IDZ will have higher risk due to tsunami, so these areas should receive priority in mitigation action and also planning implementation.
2. Identification of Element at risk
The spatial distribution of settlement is obtained from topographic maps. Actually, not only settlement that we should consider for element at risk due to tsunami but there are many elements which are vulnerable for tsunami also. For example: inhabitants, infrastructure, cultivated area, properties, etc.
3. Determination of tsunami hazard map for settlement
For this study, vulnerability of a settlement is determined based on its location. For the better result, actually we should also consider the building condition such as number of stories, material, construction, etc. In this case, the importance of the chosen criteria (settlement) is connected to the mitigation measures that may be taken. We divide the level of settlement risk into 4 based on inundation area, as follows:
- High vulnerability : located at ground elevation 0 – 5 meter
- Vulnerability : located at ground elevation 5 – 10 meter
- Less vulnerability : located at ground elevation 10 – 14 meter
- Very less vulnerability : located at ground elevation > 14 meter
4. Determination of vertical evacuation map
Pacitan is located in low-land area with sandy beach. At the occurrence of tsunami, escaping to the higher place would be not possible. Therefore, it is necessary to provide safety towers and artificial hills in a certain place. The criteria should be considered for this purpose including accessibility and the distance to the settlement and higher place.
5. Determination of soft structural countermeasures map
Structural tsunami countermeasures can be grouped into two types: namely, hard and soft structures. Typical hard structures are seawalls, breakwaters and groynes, while soft structures are mangrove green belts, coastal forests and land-use arrangements. For this purpose, we take into account the drainage pattern and existing landuse for mangrove using topographic map and geologic map.
As the result of these activities, we will have several maps as the basis to conduct disaster risk management activities, as follows:
1. Tsunami hazard map
2. Tsunami vertical evacuation map
3. Soft structural countermeasures map
These three maps are used to develop some threatment option to reduce tsunami impacts and effects (see in the enclosures).
Tsunami hazard map is not the final result of these activities, the main point is how to disseminate the hazard information to local communities in order to increase their awareness toward disaster occurrences. Local goverment and community based development must take into account when we dealing with local communities.
Non – structural measures
Several recommendations in the Pacitan area are conducted considering the result of this study through zoning policies as follows:
1. Restrict new development in this area to avoid loss of live and property damage. In the case of Pacitan district, Ploso and Sidoharjo villages are located in the high vulnerable and vulnerable zone. Thus, the villages and their inhabitants are prone to tsunami hazards. By restricting new development in this area and combining it with resettlement of existing inhabitants, we hope the number of loss and damage will be less devastating. Moreover, spatial coastal zone planning could be applied including set-back lines, mangroves green belts and roads connecting to upland areas for easy evacuation.
2. Mangrove plantation in the Pacitan’s coastal area for reducing the impact of tsunami’s waves. Some of experts have already proved that mangrove forest may as effective as concrete seawalls structure for reduction of tsunami effect on house damage behind the forest (Harada et all in Kathiresan).
3. Vertical evacuation. In the areas which are not possible for people to move to higher place i.e. hills, we must provide such high building for evacuate in the case of tsunami occurrences. The number of stories of the evacuation tower must consider the tsunami’s waves height. In case of Pacitan coastal area, the height of evacuation tower must be more than 5 m.
Structural measures
In addition to the recommendation above, we also recommend the other structural countermeasures that would reduce the tsunami impact, as follows:
1. Building codes. In Pacitan coastal area, building construction should consider tsunami waves force. For example, after tsunami struck Pangandaran village, fisherman house was built followed several building codes as:
a. The minimum number of stories is two, the first floor is open space allowing the tsunami waves flow without causing much damage on the houses and properties.
b. The foundation of the building using deep pier of concrete and heavy steel frames are likely to perform well in a tsunami case unless if tsunami is compromised by earthquake shaking.
2. Seawalls are one of the structural measures used in to prevent tsunamis, storm surge and high waves. This type of construction has a buffer zone to prevent coastal inundation due to overtopping waves.
3. Wave breaker is one of structural measures used for reducing the tsunami wave’s energy as they move toward land areas. Wave breaker in
4. Resettlement. Resettlement is the last option taken when we can not ensure that other structural measures will be able to reduce the impacts of tsunamis. The new settlement area must consider the worse scenario.
1. Pacitan’s coastline is a tourism area so structural measures built in that area must have double function as mitigation structure and as a tourism object.
2. Community Based Disaster Mitigation is one of the most effective ways to reduce the impacts of tsunami hazard in term of community empowerment toward tsunami hazard reduction.
DRMIS
Disaster risk management information system (DRMIS) can be defined as an information system designed to prevent the loss of lives, minimize human suffering, inform the public and authorities of risk and minimize property damage and economic loss, speed up the recovery process.
East Java Province DRMIS is a vital needed due to the intensity of disaster occurrences in that area from landslide to earthquake. Moreover, the development of internet makes the process of information dissemination broader than before.
Disaster risk management is efforts that prevent the impacts of disaster in the study area carried out in the series activities of prevention, preparedness, response, recovery, mitigation and risk reduction and rehabilitation. One effective tool to carry out disaster risk management process is definition of hazard and vulnerability maps which function as the basis map for all of disaster risk management activities. From the case of tsunami hazard assessment of Pacitan coastal line, we can see the usefulness of these maps for response, recovery and mitigation activities.